<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nas central weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nas-central.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nas-central.org</link>
	<description>Your source for vendor independent NAS news</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>On the news / GPL violation alleged</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Central]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NAS Community News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago while searching for other NAS hacking communities i started to download and request GPL sources for various NAS devices (check gpl.nas-central.org). For those devices without available GPL sources and without any positive feedback from the the manufacturer (read my first post at the gpl-violations.org) lists i started to investigate if it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago while searching for other NAS hacking communities i started to download and request GPL sources for various NAS devices (check <a title="gpl.nas-central.org" href="http://gpl.nas-central.org">gpl.nas-central.org</a>). For those devices without available GPL sources and without any positive feedback from the the manufacturer (read <a title="http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/tech/2008-January/000166.html" href="http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/tech/2008-January/000166.html">my first post at the gpl-violations.org</a>) lists i started to investigate if it is possible to disassemble the firmwares to proove a GPL violation. With the help of gotnas i succeeded in creating a script for disassembling the firmware of the Hammer Myshare, a NAS also based on the Marvell Orion SoC. I uploaded the script to the nas-central.org downloadsection and posted  instructions about how to disassemble the firmware and how to mount the initrd at the gpl-violations.org lists so it is easily possible to verify the GPL violations (read <a href="http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/tech/2008-January/000167.html">my second post at gpl-violations.org</a>). After a while where nothing happened i decided to notify the busybox developers (<a href="http://busybox.net">busybox.net</a>) and linuxdevices.org about the posts and an article was featured instantly(<a title="NAS hackers allege GPL violation" href="http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9301055710.html">NAS hackers allege GPL violation</a>). A few days later the Software Freedom Law Center announced that it has filed two new copyright infringement lawsuits on behalf of the busybox developers Rob Landley and Erik Andersen against Bell Microproducts, Inc. &amp; Super Micro Computer, Inc (<a href="http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/jun/10/busybox/">SFLC Files Another Round of GPL Violation Lawsuits on Behalf of BusyBox Developers</a> , <a title="Bell, SuperMicro sued over GPL" href="http://linux-watch.com/news/NS7258915032.html">linux-watch.com story</a>).</p>
<p>Seems like it wasn`t wasted time <img src='http://blog.nas-central.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detailed documentation available for the Marvell Orion ARM SoC`s</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/05/19/detaile-documentation-available-for-the-marvell-orion-socs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/05/19/detaile-documentation-available-for-the-marvell-orion-socs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Community News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marvell released Datasheets / Functional Erratas / User Manuals which describe the 88F5182 (&#8221;Feroceon SoC for Networking Storage&#8221;) and the 88F5181 (&#8221;Feroceon SoC for High Performance Networking&#8221;) ARM SoC`s (former known as Marvell Orion ARM SoC`s) in great detail. Another nice move from Marvell after managing to get support for this SoC`s into the mainline [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marvell.com/products/media/index.jsp">Marvell released Datasheets / Functional Erratas / User Manuals</a> which describe the 88F5182 (&#8221;Feroceon SoC for Networking Storage&#8221;) and the 88F5181 (&#8221;Feroceon SoC for High Performance Networking&#8221;) ARM SoC`s (former known as Marvell Orion ARM SoC`s) in great detail. Another nice move from Marvell <a title="2.6.25 released - support for marvell orion SoCs now in the vanilla kernel" href="http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/04/18/2625-released-support-for-marvell-orion-socs-now-in-the-vanilla-kernel/" target="_self">after managing to get support for this SoC`s into the mainline kernel</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/05/19/detaile-documentation-available-for-the-marvell-orion-socs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>nas-central.org server maintainence window</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/05/01/nas-centralorg-server-maintainence-window/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/05/01/nas-centralorg-server-maintainence-window/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Central]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be a Server Maintainence window from 20:00-22:00UTC 02/05/08 that will incude some Hardware upgrades.
During that time any or all of the following services will be unavailable:
wiki
subversion
trac
forum
ka6sox (for the nas-central.org infrastructure team)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There will be a Server Maintainence window from 20:00-22:00UTC 02/05/08 that will incude some Hardware upgrades.</p>
<p>During that time any or all of the following services will be unavailable:</p>
<p>wiki<br />
subversion<br />
trac<br />
forum</p>
<p>ka6sox (for the nas-central.org infrastructure team)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/05/01/nas-centralorg-server-maintainence-window/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2.6.25 released - Support for Marvell Orion SoC`s now in the vanilla kernel</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/04/18/2625-released-support-for-marvell-orion-socs-now-in-the-vanilla-kernel/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/04/18/2625-released-support-for-marvell-orion-socs-now-in-the-vanilla-kernel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Community News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Version 2.6.25 was released  on the 16th April 2008. This means that the Marvell`s Feroceon micro-architecture and Orion-SoC`s are now officially supported by the mainline kernel.

LKML release post
Changelog for 2.6.25 at kernel.org
Article at linuxdevices.com
Changes with explanations for 2.6.25 at kernelnewbies.org

Get the kernel sources at kernel.org.
This does not mean that many NAS devices are now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Version 2.6.25 was released  on the 16th April 2008. This means that the Marvell`s Feroceon micro-architecture and Orion-SoC`s are now officially supported by the mainline kernel.</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="LKML Post" href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/489" target="_blank">LKML release post</a></li>
<li><a title="Changelog 2.6.25" href="http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.25" target="_blank">Changelog for 2.6.25 at kernel.org</a></li>
<li><a title="Linux 2.6.25 release bolsters ARM" href="http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS7210809585.html" target="_blank">Article at linuxdevices.com</a></li>
<li><a title="Changes explained at kernelnewbies.org" href="http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_25" target="_blank">Changes with explanations for 2.6.25 at kernelnewbies.org</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Get the kernel sources at <a title="http://kernel.org/" href="http://kernel.org/" target="_blank">kernel.org</a>.</p>
<p>This does not mean that many NAS devices are now automatically supported, but it means that the hard work was already done for most of them. If you own a NAS based on the Orion SoC and you want to add support for it in the vanilla kernel then start by reading the <a title="Orion_NAS_customisation_guide" href="http://nas-central.org/index.php/Orion_NAS_customisation_guide">Orion_NAS_customisation_guide</a>. As long as your box does not have any special totally unsupported feature then it should be possible to add support with little effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/04/18/2625-released-support-for-marvell-orion-socs-now-in-the-vanilla-kernel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux kernel port for the Marvell Orion boards</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/26/linux-kernel-port-for-the-marvell-orion-boards/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/26/linux-kernel-port-for-the-marvell-orion-boards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Community News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/26/linux-kernel-port-for-the-marvell-orion-boards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[linuxdevices.com features an article about the ongoing things regarding the Marvell Orion Linux kernel port. It gives some good information about who is involved.
Read more here. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>linuxdevices.com features an article about the ongoing things regarding the Marvell Orion Linux kernel port. It gives some good information about who is involved.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS5637467946.html" title="Linux gains new architecture support">Read more here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/26/linux-kernel-port-for-the-marvell-orion-boards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAS Reviews at smallnetbuilder.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/21/nas-reviews-at-smallnetbuildercom/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/21/nas-reviews-at-smallnetbuildercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Community News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/21/nas-reviews-at-smallnetbuildercom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[smallnetbuilder.com definitely provides the best NAS reviews, especially because the reviewer (mostly the well known Jim Buzbee) always takes a glance at the mainboard and tries to get shell access. Always checkout the &#8220;Under the covers&#8221; page to gather some hardware information.
Take a look at the recent reviews at smallnetbuilder.com.

Buffalo Linkstation EX aka LS-LGL

Zyxel NSA-220
QNAP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smallnetbuilder.com definitely provides the best NAS reviews, especially because the reviewer (mostly the well known <a href="http://www.batbox.org/nslu2-linux.html">Jim Buzbee</a>) always takes a glance at the mainboard and tries to get shell access. Always checkout the &#8220;Under the covers&#8221; page to gather some hardware information.</p>
<p>Take a look at the recent reviews at <a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/blogcategory/50/75/" title="smallnetbuilder.com NAS reviews">smallnetbuilder.com</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30334/75/">Buffalo Linkstation EX aka LS-LGL<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30323/75/">Zyxel NSA-220</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30324/75/">QNAP TS-409</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30295/75/">Buffalo Linkstation Pro DUO</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30273/75/">Promise SmartStor</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30135/75/">HP MediaSmart Server EX470/EX475</a> (Windows based)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30181/75/">QNAP TS-209 Pro</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30157/75/">Synology Disk Station DS107 series</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/21/nas-reviews-at-smallnetbuildercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>General NAS Forums opened their doors</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/11/general-nas-forums-opened-their-doors/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/11/general-nas-forums-opened-their-doors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Central]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NAS Community News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/11/general-nas-forums-opened-their-doors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After moving the buffalo forums to the new place it was time to make the wiki authentication independent from the buffalo forums.
Therefore a new forum at

http://forums.nas-central.org/

was created. Notice that forumsections for HP, Iomega, Lacie, Netgear and Zyxel were created as these vendors do not have any user driven forums for their boxes.  I added [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After moving the buffalo forums to the new place it was time to make the wiki authentication independent from the buffalo forums.</p>
<p>Therefore a new forum at</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://forums.nas-central.org" target="_blank" title="http://forums.nas-central.org">http://forums.nas-central.org/</a></li>
</ul>
<p>was created. Notice that forumsections for HP, Iomega, Lacie, Netgear and Zyxel were created as these vendors do not have any user driven forums for their boxes.  I added one for Linksys so EFG250/NAS200 owners have a place for discussion as well.</p>
<p>The main reasons for creating this forums are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hardware mods (serial/jtag/&#8230;) can be investigated &amp; discussed in the hardware sections</li>
<li>In the kernel development section it can be discussed how to create support for SoC X/Board design Y in the vanilla kernel independent from the special hardware. Many boxes share the same SoC (Marvell orion, Storlink gemini)</li>
</ul>
<p>Read the announcement <a href="http://forums.nas-central.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&amp;t=6" title="here" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/11/general-nas-forums-opened-their-doors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving the buffalo forum + downloads to the right place</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/22/moving-the-buffalo-forum-to-its-right-place/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/22/moving-the-buffalo-forum-to-its-right-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NAS Central]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/22/moving-the-buffalo-forum-to-its-right-place/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following this poll it is clear that the majority wants the buffalo forum to be integrated with buffalo.nas-central.org and not moved away again from nas-central.org. The forum currently just is in the wrong place at forum.nas-central.org (same for the downloads), the forum is no general forum for nas-central.org (which possibly is needed later for linking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following <a href="http://forum.nas-central.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&amp;t=5056&amp;start=0" title="this poll">this poll</a> it is clear that the majority wants the buffalo forum to be integrated with buffalo.nas-central.org and not moved away again from nas-central.org. The forum currently just is in the wrong place at forum.nas-central.org (same for the downloads), the forum is no general forum for nas-central.org (which possibly is needed later for linking subwiki authentication together). Thats why this is happening on the 25 February 2008.</p>
<p><strong>Start: </strong>1600 UTC</p>
<p><strong>End:</strong>   2100 UTC</p>
<p>Notice that login in all the subwikis is affected as authentication of all subwikis (except the buffalo one) is linked to the forum database.</p>
<p><strong>EDIT:</strong> Forum + downloadsection moved successfully.</p>
<p>Unfortunately it took longer than expected but everything now works again. See <a href="http://buffalo.nas-central.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&amp;t=6106&amp;p=54871#p54871" title="this thread">this thread</a> for more info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/22/moving-the-buffalo-forum-to-its-right-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Server downtime yesterday</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/19/server-downtime-yesterday/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/19/server-downtime-yesterday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Central]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[foonas.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/19/server-downtime-yesterday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the server was down for some hours. Reason for that was a problem with UDEV on the XEN-server. After reboot it seems that all services for foonas.org / nas-central.org are back online. In case you notice any problems please report back in this thread.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday the server was down for some hours. Reason for that was a problem with UDEV on the XEN-server. After reboot it seems that all services for foonas.org / nas-central.org are back online. In case you notice any problems please report back in <a href="http://forum.nas-central.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&amp;t=5926" title="this thread">this thread</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/19/server-downtime-yesterday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>syno-x07 feed optware feed available</title>
		<link>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/16/syno-x07-feed-optware-feed-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/16/syno-x07-feed-optware-feed-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mindbender</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NAS Community News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/16/syno-x07-feed-optware-feed-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All owners of Marvell Orion based boxes by Synology should look at this thread. bzhou created an optware feed which is located here. Get involved and help testing!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All owners of Marvell Orion based boxes by Synology should look at <a href="http://www.synology.com/enu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&amp;t=6383&amp;start=2&amp;st=0&amp;sk=t&amp;sd=a" title="this thread">this thread</a>. bzhou created an optware feed which is located <a href="http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/syno-x07/cross/unstable/" title="here">here</a>. Get involved and help testing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/02/16/syno-x07-feed-optware-feed-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
