http://blog.nas-central.org network attached storage, embedded development, news, ramblings Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:59:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://blog.nas-central.org/2009/09/01/iomega-announce-ix4-200d-smb-nas/comment-page-1/#comment-53773 Dan Schneck Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:59:52 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=172#comment-53773 The ix4-200d is running VERY buggy software/firmware. Worst of all, Iomega admits the device is horribly buggy and will then turn around and tell you you'll need to spend $4,500 to have your data recovered off the unit. Unbelievably crappy product. My advice is to NOT use this for any production data whatsoever. The ix4-200d is running VERY buggy software/firmware. Worst of all, Iomega admits the device is horribly buggy and will then turn around and tell you you’ll need to spend $4,500 to have your data recovered off the unit. Unbelievably crappy product. My advice is to NOT use this for any production data whatsoever.

]]> http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/10/10/vanilla-kernel-genlink-for-linkstation-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-53731 teddy Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:47:47 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=232#comment-53731 I'm begainner...I wanna lean about NAS I’m begainner…I wanna lean about NAS

]]> http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/26/linux-kernel-port-for-the-marvell-orion-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-53706 luteragzfer Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:36:16 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/03/26/linux-kernel-port-for-the-marvell-orion-boards/#comment-53706 Mike Mossberg, I know you reading this forum, please contact me, because I can't find your contact details. Mike Mossberg, I know you reading this forum, please contact me, because I can’t find your contact details.

]]> http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/comment-page-1/#comment-19406 groobydooby Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:49:04 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=61#comment-19406 nospam, check out the dates of mindbender's posts (january 2008)... it actually took them about 6 months to get it those tarballs posted... seems like the process actually was worth the time... nospam, check out the dates of mindbender’s posts (january 2008)… it actually took them about 6 months to get it those tarballs posted… seems like the process actually was worth the time…

]]> http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/comment-page-1/#comment-9246 NOSPAM Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:22:26 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=61#comment-9246 The GPL code is already posted by Hammer...... has a timestamp of 06/11/08 The GPL code is already posted by Hammer…… has a timestamp of 06/11/08

]]>