Comments on: On the news / GPL violation alleged http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/ Your source for vendor independent NAS news Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:32:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: groobydooby http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/#comment-19406 groobydooby Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:49:04 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=61#comment-19406 nospam, check out the dates of mindbender's posts (january 2008)... it actually took them about 6 months to get it those tarballs posted... seems like the process actually was worth the time... nospam, check out the dates of mindbender’s posts (january 2008)… it actually took them about 6 months to get it those tarballs posted… seems like the process actually was worth the time…

]]> By: NOSPAM http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/#comment-9246 NOSPAM Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:22:26 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=61#comment-9246 The GPL code is already posted by Hammer...... has a timestamp of 06/11/08 The GPL code is already posted by Hammer…… has a timestamp of 06/11/08

]]> By: Fred http://blog.nas-central.org/2008/06/18/on-the-news-gpl-violation-of-bell-supermico/#comment-9196 Fred Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:28:13 +0000 http://blog.nas-central.org/?p=61#comment-9196 mindbender, Did you happen to read some of the comments on a related Slashdot article? One of them mentions the recent appearance of source tarballs on the website at the bottom of this page: http://www.hammer-storage.com/support/software_updates.asp Certainly seems like it was worth your time to complain! mindbender,

Did you happen to read some of the comments on a related Slashdot article? One of them mentions the recent appearance of source tarballs on the website at the bottom of this page: http://www.hammer-storage.com/support/software_updates.asp

Certainly seems like it was worth your time to complain!

]]>